Changeset 1044 for papers/SMPaT-2012_DCWoRMS
- Timestamp:
- 04/04/13 13:55:42 (12 years ago)
- File:
-
- 1 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
papers/SMPaT-2012_DCWoRMS/review/reviewers_remarks
r957 r1044 15 15 16 16 Some questions : 17 -page 7 : for workload modeling : is it possible to use SWF file and XML file for the same simulation ? 17 -page 7 : for workload modeling : is it possible to use SWF file and XML file for the same simulation ? +++++ 18 18 -page 18 : I think there are mistakes in the sections referenced : the static model is presented in section 4.2 ? the dynamic one in section 4.3 ? and the mapping in section 4.4 ? 19 19 -table 8 : the EO+NPM give the same results as R is it normal ? … … 31 31 32 32 Detailed comments 33 -Section 2:What is the meaning of the phrase: 'imposes and restricts users in terms of modeled resources'? Explain or rephrase to make the contribution of the paper clear 33 -Section 2:What is the meaning of the phrase: 'imposes and restricts users in terms of modeled resources'? Explain or rephrase to make the contribution of the paper clear++++ 34 34 -Section 3.4: No explanation of how 'thermal issues' are taken into account is presented in the experimental section. 35 35 -Section 3.2-3.5: It would be useful to provide a short concise summary about which information should be the input to the simulator by the user, how the tool deals with this input and what are the outputs. 36 36 -Section 5.4: The question that arises here is how hard/realistic it is to run each application on each type of node for all frequencies in advance in order to use the mapping approach. It would be useful to show the results from these measurements and show how the equation (7) fits on these data. 37 37 In this context, it would be interesting to run the simulations for the case that the model of equation (7) is used, and show whether the energy optimization techniques result in real savings or not due to the model errors. 38 -Section 5.4: Please provide some explanation on table 5. 38 -Section 5.4: Please provide some explanation on table 5.++++ 39 39 -Section 5.5.1: Figures 6 and especially the Gannt charts in all cases are impossible to read. It would be more useful to present a 'zoom in' for a specific case to show the information that this chart holds. 40 40 -Section 5.5.3: It would be interesting to show or comment on the existence of a 'critical' slow-down frequency above which the slow down is indeed energy efficient despite the longer execution times. 41 -Section 5.6: In the tables it appears that less load has greater energy usage and makespan values than the respective values of greater load. Please explain. 41 -Section 5.6: In the tables it appears that less load has greater energy usage and makespan values than the respective values of greater load. Please explain.++++ 42 42 43 43
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.
