Changeset 1078 for papers/SMPaT-2012_DCWoRMS
- Timestamp:
- 06/08/13 21:47:40 (12 years ago)
- Location:
- papers/SMPaT-2012_DCWoRMS
- Files:
-
- 5 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
papers/SMPaT-2012_DCWoRMS/elsarticle-DCWoRMS.aux
r1077 r1078 117 117 \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.6}Verification of models}{28}} 118 118 \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Static}{28}} 119 \newlabel{eq:modelStatic}{{10}{28}} 119 120 \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Dynamic}{28}} 120 \newlabel{eq:modelLoadApp}{{1 0}{28}}121 \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Application}{2 8}}121 \newlabel{eq:modelLoadApp}{{11}{28}} 122 \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Application}{29}} 122 123 \@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces Comparison of energy usage estimations [kWh] obtained for investigated power consumption models. R - Random, R+NPM - Random + node power management, EO - Energy optimization, EO+NPM - Energy optimization + node power management, R+LF - Random + lowest frequency}}{29}} 123 124 \newlabel{modelsResults}{{9}{29}} 124 125 \@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces Comparison of accuracy [\%] obtained for investigated power consumption models. R - Random, R+NPM - Random + node power management, EO - Energy optimization, EO+NPM - Energy optimization + node power management, R+LF - Random + lowest frequency}}{29}} 125 126 \newlabel{modelsAccuracy}{{10}{29}} 126 \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Conclusions and future work}{ 29}}127 \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Conclusions and future work}{30}} 127 128 \bibcite{fit4green}{{1}{}{{}}{{}}} 128 \newlabel{}{{6}{30}}129 129 \bibcite{e2dc13}{{2}{}{{}}{{}}} 130 130 \bibcite{e2dc12}{{3}{}{{}}{{}}} … … 134 134 \bibcite{DCD_Romonet}{{7}{}{{}}{{}}} 135 135 \bibcite{networks}{{8}{}{{}}{{}}} 136 \newlabel{}{{6}{31}} 136 137 \bibcite{Ghislain}{{9}{}{{}}{{}}} 137 138 \bibcite{games}{{10}{}{{}}{{}}} -
papers/SMPaT-2012_DCWoRMS/elsarticle-DCWoRMS.fdb_latexmk
r1077 r1078 1 1 # Fdb version 2 2 ["pdflatex"] 13707 02589 "elsarticle-DCWoRMS.tex" "elsarticle-DCWoRMS.pdf" "elsarticle-DCWoRMS"2 ["pdflatex"] 1370720839 "elsarticle-DCWoRMS.tex" "elsarticle-DCWoRMS.pdf" "elsarticle-DCWoRMS" 3 3 "/usr/local/texlive/2010/texmf-dist/tex/context/base/supp-pdf.mkii" 1251025892 71625 fad1c4b52151c234b6873a255b0ad6b3 "" 4 4 "/usr/local/texlive/2010/texmf-dist/tex/generic/oberdiek/etexcmds.sty" 1267408169 5670 cacb018555825cfe95cd1e1317d82c1d "" … … 30 30 "/usr/local/texlive/2010/texmf-dist/tex/latex/psnfss/upsy.fd" 1137110629 148 2da0acd77cba348f34823f44cabf0058 "" 31 31 "/usr/local/texlive/2010/texmf-dist/tex/latex/psnfss/upzd.fd" 1137110629 148 b2a94082cb802f90d3daf6dd0c7188a0 "" 32 "elsarticle-DCWoRMS.aux" 13707 02591 9018 425f77cfa7830045e4cbd18ac6a0c0b5""33 "elsarticle-DCWoRMS.spl" 13707 02589 0 d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e ""34 "elsarticle-DCWoRMS.tex" 13707 02589 80309 640d0441cedb5cc9f92998ca923ce3a7""32 "elsarticle-DCWoRMS.aux" 1370720841 9054 ce767eca17a41673648ebec1ac97b451 "" 33 "elsarticle-DCWoRMS.spl" 1370720839 0 d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e "" 34 "elsarticle-DCWoRMS.tex" 1370720839 80999 74059f701981185c8ea7126e062971ba "" 35 35 "elsarticle.cls" 1352447924 26095 ad44f4892f75e6e05dca57a3581f78d1 "" 36 36 "fig/70dfsGantt.png" 1370005142 138858 edc557d8862a7825f2941d8c69c30659 "" -
papers/SMPaT-2012_DCWoRMS/elsarticle-DCWoRMS.tex
r1077 r1078 533 533 This model refers to the Application specific approach presented in Section~\ref{sec:power}. Power usage was defined using the equation presented in \ref{eq:model}. 534 534 535 Table~\ref{nodeBasePowerUsage} and Table~\ref{appPowerUsage} contain values of $P_{cpubase}$ and $P_{app}$, respectively, obtained for the particular application and resource architectures. Lack of the corresponding value means that the application did not run on the given type of node. 535 Table~\ref{nodeBasePowerUsage} and Table~\ref{appPowerUsage} contain values of $P_{cpubase}$ and $P_{app}$, respectively, obtained for the particular application and resource architectures. Lack of the corresponding value means that the application did not run on the given type of node. $c$ constant was found and equal to 1.12. 536 536 \begin {table}[h!] 537 537 \centering … … 729 729 730 730 \paragraph{Static} 731 TODO 731 With each node power state, understood as a possible operating state (p-state), we associated a power consumption value that derives from the averaged values of measurements obtained for different types of application. Therefore, the current power usage of the node, can be expressed as: 732 \begin{equation} 733 P = P_{idle} + P_{f} \label{eq:modelStatic} 734 \end{equation} 735 736 where $P$ denotes power consumed by the node, $P_{idle}$ is a power usage of node in idle state and $P_{f}$ stands for power usage of CPU operating at the given frequency level. 732 737 733 738 \paragraph{Dynamic} … … 741 746 742 747 \paragraph{Application} 743 T ODO748 The applied model followed the equation (\ref{eq:model}) and used the data presented in Section \ref{sec:models}. 744 749 745 750 Table \ref{modelsResults} contains the results obtained for all examined models for five resource management strategies presented in the previous section, while Table \ref{modelsAccuracy} summarize their accuracy.
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.