Changes between Version 67 and Version 68 of benchmarks
- Timestamp:
- 11/23/11 14:07:29 (13 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
benchmarks
v67 v68 148 148 == QCG-Notification == 149 149 150 QCG-Notification performance was compared to the performance of two other services implementing brokered version of WS-Notification specification. These were Apache ServiceMix (version 3.3.1) and IBMWebSphere Application Server (version 7.0).150 The QCG-Notification performance was compared to the performance of two other services implementing brokered version of WS-Notification specification. These were Apache !ServiceMix (version 3.3.1) and IBM !WebSphere Application Server (version 7.0). 151 151 152 152 A reliable performance tests of the notification systems are difficult to realise. Note that the distribution time of a single, small SOAP notification message can be easily disrupted by underlying best effort transport protocols, network protocols, services, etc. Therefore the presented results refer to the average notification delivery time measured on a basis of significant amount of singular sends. 153 153 154 Taking into account that the tested notification systems are different: each system provides a set of specific functions that is not always the same in the another systems (for example, ServiceMix doesn’t provide support for Full topic dialect) decision was to test the most common features and focus on key scenarios.154 Taking into account that the tested notification systems are different: each system provides a set of specific functions that is not always the same in the another systems (for example, !ServiceMix doesn’t provide support for Full topic dialect) decision was to test the most common features and focus on key scenarios. 155 155 156 156 The established testbed connected two homogenous machines over the 1Gb Ethernet as it is presented in the attached Figure