Changes between Version 93 and Version 94 of benchmarks

Timestamp:

11/24/11 09:21:52 (12 years ago)

Author:

bartek

Comment:

--

benchmarks

@@ -200 +200 @@
 
 ''Pros:''
-* Possibility to compare performance of the systems in the typical scenario with notification forwarding to Notification Consumers.
+* Possibility to compare performance of the systems in the typical scenario that takes into account notification forwarding to Notification Consumers.
 * The time is measured not only by Publisher but also by Notification Consumer which gives more precise results of processing time.
 
 ''Cons:''
-* The Publisher installed only on a single machine.
-* The notification services in a default configuration and only marginally loaded (only several subscriptions).
-* !WebSphere Application Server concatenates received messages if they are forwarded to the same Notification Consumer - although in general it improves the performance, sometimes it may imposes delays in sending to consumers.
+* The Publisher and Notification Consumer programs installed only on a single, the same machine.
+* The notification services in a default configuration and marginally loaded (only several subscriptions).
+* !WebSphere Application Server concatenates received messages if they are forwarded to the same Notification Consumer - although in general it improves the performance, sometimes it may impose delays in sending to consumers and improper results. Nevertheless this point was practically neutralized thanks to measuring the time of large amount of elementary operations.
 
 ==== Results ====